Vendor Risk Management for Banks: What OJK and DORA Expect and How to Meet It
CyberRank Research
Vendor risk management for banks is the oversight of every outsourcing and technology provider a bank depends on: core banking software, cloud hosting, payment processors, collection agencies and more. In Indonesia, OJK expects banks to assess, contract and monitor these providers; in the EU, DORA sets ICT third-party rules for financial entities. CyberRank gives banks continuous, outside-in evidence of each provider's security posture to support that oversight.
TL;DR
- OJK requires Indonesian banks to manage IT risk, including outsourcing risk (notably under POJK 38/POJK.03/2016); DORA does the same for EU financial entities.
- Regulators expect assessment before contract, contractual safeguards and ongoing oversight, not a one-off questionnaire.
- Tier providers by impact: core banking, payments and customer-data processors come first.
- CyberRank rates every provider AAA–D from public signals, reassesses monitored providers nightly and produces reports and evidence trails for supervisors and auditors.
What do regulators expect from banks on vendor risk?
Regulators expect banks to assess providers before contracting, put safeguards in the contract, and oversee providers continuously for as long as the relationship lasts.
In Indonesia, OJK requires banks to manage risk in their use of information technology, including outsourcing to third parties, as explained in detail in our article about OJK outsourcing and IT risk rules. In the EU, DORA sets ICT third-party risk rules for financial entities. Banks that hold personal data are also accountable for their processors under UU PDP.
Which bank vendors should be tiered first?
Start with the providers whose failure stops a critical banking service or who hold customer data.
The full tiering model and the six-stage lifecycle are explained in detail in our article about third-party risk management. For banks, a practical split is:
- Critical: core banking and payment processing, cloud and data-centre hosting, card and digital-channel providers.
- High: customer-data processors such as collection agencies, call centres and marketing platforms.
- Medium and low: providers without access to customer data or critical systems.
How does CyberRank help banks manage vendor risk?
CyberRank gives a bank an independent, continuously updated view of every provider's security and privacy posture, plus the evidence supervisors ask for.
Many provider incidents are supply chain attacks in disguise (see our guide to supply chain attacks and how to prevent them). For the bank's side, CyberRank provides:
- Outside-in AAA–D rating of each provider from its domain, with separate Security and Privacy sub-ratings.
- Impact tiers combined with breach likelihood into a risk level and heat map, so critical providers with weak posture come first.
- Nightly reassessment of monitored providers, with events for rating changes, new data breaches and privacy-policy changes.
- Hosting and data-residency checks against the jurisdictions the bank allows.
- Management Report for the board, Cyber Risk Report for the security team, and an Assurance Statement auditors can verify.
Frequently asked questions
Get your free security rating
Run a free CyberRank security rating for any organisation and see the same vendor risk signals our customers use.
Get your free security rating